The use of baby carriers and their improvements in the amygdala's response to infant crying

A baby's cry is not just a sound. It's a biological alarm. A stimulus designed to pierce walls, sleep, patience, and logic. When it sounds, something very ancient is activated in the adult brain: the amygdala, that primitive nucleus that decides in milliseconds whether to flee, attack… or care.

But not all cries are processed the same way. Some parents tense up, freeze up, feel overwhelmed. And others, faced with the same cry, respond with almost surgical calm. The difference isn't always in experience, personality, or even love. Sometimes it's in the body. In physical distance. In whether that baby is far away… or literally pressed against the chest.

The baby carrier is not just a parenting tool; it can also act as a modulator of the neurobiological context of the adult's response. It's a bridge between two nervous systems that are not yet able to function independently. And in that constant, silent, almost invisible contact, the adult amygdala gradually readjusts: crying is no longer a threat, but a signal that can be regulated.

This article isn't about parenting fads or "attachment parenting" as a label. It's about pure neuroscience. About how holding a baby can modify the way the adult brain processes stress, urgency, and fear. And why, when we understand this, crying stops being noise... and becomes information.

Infant crying as a neurobiological stimulus: what it actually activates in the adult brain

A baby's cry is not a neutral sound or a mere annoying noise. It functions as a high-priority neurobiological signal, designed to capture the adult's attention quickly and effectively. In response to this signal, the parental brain activates circuits that detect emotional relevance, with the amygdala playing a key role in assessing whether the situation requires an immediate response. This activation focuses attention, increases vigilance, and mobilizes the emotional and physiological resources necessary for care.

This response is, under normal circumstances, adaptive. Crying indicates a need, and the adult brain organizes itself to respond to it. However, when the signal is prolonged or occurs in contexts of fatigue, stress, or emotional overload, the activation can intensify and become more difficult to regulate. Instead of facilitating care, crying begins to be experienced as a constant urgency that overwhelms the capacity for an organized response.

In these contexts, the adult brain doesn't fail due to a lack of sensitivity, but rather due to over-activation. Understanding crying as a biological signal, and not simply as an emotional trigger, is key to understanding why variables such as physical distance, the caregiver's physical state, or close contact can significantly alter how this signal is processed in the brain.

The parental amygdala: between alarm and emotional regulation

The parental amygdala doesn't function as a simple fear center, but rather as a system for assigning emotional priorities. Its main function is to detect relevant stimuli, such as infant crying, and quickly decide how urgent they are. In parents, this structure shows particularly sensitive activation in response to crying, reflecting a neurobiological adaptation linked to the caregiving role rather than a pathological response.

However, this activation is neither uniform nor automatic. Factors such as accumulated fatigue, sustained stress, or a personal history of adversity modulate how the amygdala responds. In some contexts, it can intensify the signal and generate an overwhelming sense of urgency; in others, it can be excessively attenuated, leading to flatter or disconnected emotional responses. In both cases, the problem is not a lack of connection, but rather a temporary difficulty in emotional regulation.

This delicate balance between alarm and regulation depends not only on the sound of the cry, but also on the context in which it is perceived. Available bodily information, physical proximity, and the adult's physiological state decisively influence how the amygdala interprets the signal. To understand why physical contact can tip this balance toward a more organized response, it is necessary to observe what happens when the baby is no longer at a distance and becomes part of the caregiver's own physical space.

Physical contact and brain: what happens when the baby is close to the body

When a baby is kept in close physical contact with an adult, the processing of crying occurs in a radically different sensory context. Deep touch, body warmth, rhythmic movement, and proprioception provide continuous information to the adult nervous system, reducing the uncertainty associated with the auditory signal. This change in the sensory environment is associated with greater physiological stability in both the caregiver and the baby.

From a neuropsychological perspective, physical proximity reduces the ambiguity of the stimulus. The adult does not need to interpret what is happening from a distance because the baby's body provides constant signals about its state. This information allows the amygdala to operate outside of alarm mode, enabling a more nuanced assessment of the situation and more organized emotional regulation.

The effect of physical contact lies not in eliminating emotional arousal, but in making it more predictable and manageable. By integrating tactile and postural cues, the adult brain has more data to modulate its response, reducing the likelihood of disproportionate defensive reactions. This point is key to understanding why practices that maintain sustained proximity, such as babywearing, can consistently influence the emotional experience of caregiving.

Baby carriers and stress modulation: evidence from psychology and neuroscience

The use of baby carriers should not be seen as an automatic solution to parental distress, but rather as a practice that modifies the context in which the adult brain processes crying. Available evidence shows that maintaining sustained physical proximity can alter how the amygdala is activated by this signal, especially in caregivers who initially exhibit less sensitivity to infant crying.

Some controlled studies have observed that babywearing is associated with increased amygdala reactivity to crying, particularly in parents. This finding does not indicate increased stress, but rather greater sensitivity to the signal, interpreted as a more refined activation toward caregiving and not as a defensive response. In this context, a more reactive amygdala does not imply greater distress, but rather an earlier and more organized detection of the baby's needs.

At the same time, babywearing is associated with a reduction in infant crying and physiological indicators of stress, which introduces a key nuance to the interpretation of these results. Part of the observed effect may be due to the stimulus becoming less intense or less frequent, and not exclusively to changes in the adult brain. For this reason, although the relationship is consistent, the evidence requires caution: not all studies allow for establishing direct causality, and variables such as interaction time, parental motivation, and emotional context have a significant influence.

Beyond isolated mechanisms, the value of baby carriers lies in their simultaneous action on both systems involved in crying: the adult's and the baby's. This dual effect allows us to understand babywearing not only as an individual practice, but also as a tool that can modify the shared regulatory dynamics between caregiver and child.

Cross-regulation: how the adult's state calms (or amplifies) the baby's crying

Emotional regulation in the first months of life is not an individual process, but a shared phenomenon between the baby and their caregiver. Crying activates physiological and emotional responses in the adult, and these responses (through body tone, rhythm, muscle tension, or breathing) in turn influence the baby's state. This continuous exchange creates feedback loops that can either stabilize or intensify the initial distress.

When an adult is highly aroused, their body transmits unpredictable signals that the baby, still immature in terms of regulation, cannot process. In this context, crying tends to persist or intensify. Conversely, when the adult nervous system achieves a more stable state of arousal, the baby has a predictable bodily environment that facilitates the gradual reduction of discomfort. The key is not to suppress arousal, but to keep it within manageable levels.

Babywearing introduces a significant change to this dynamic by promoting the caregiver's physiological stability: rhythmic movement, sustained posture, and continuous contact. By reducing the chaotic variability of adult signals, the likelihood of reciprocal emotional escalations is decreased. In this context, the adult amygdala does not need to amplify the urgency of crying, and the baby responds to a body that conveys coherence and continuity.

Understanding regulation as a shared process allows us to shift the focus from "cry control" to organizing the relational context. This perspective is especially relevant when analyzing the potential implications of babywearing not only as a daily practice, but also as a preventative measure against the emotional strain associated with early care.

Clinical and everyday implications: parenting, mental health, and prevention of parental burnout

From a clinical perspective, the mechanisms described allow us to understand babywearing as a contextual tool to support emotional regulation, rather than as a therapeutic intervention in itself. By modifying how the adult brain processes crying and reducing the likelihood of emotional escalations, it can help decrease the emotional overload associated with intensive care, especially during periods of high demand.

In everyday life, this effect translates into greater emotional availability for the caregiver without a proportional increase in burnout. It's not about eliminating tiredness or discomfort, but rather making them more manageable, preventing sustained activation from leading to chronic irritability, emotional disconnection, or feelings of parental inadequacy. In this sense, babywearing can act as a facilitator of stability in contexts where adult self-regulation is temporarily compromised.

However, it is essential to recognize its limitations. Babywearing does not replace psychological or psychiatric support when depression, significant anxiety, or unresolved trauma are present. Furthermore, its effect is not uniform: for some people, constant physical contact can initially be overstimulating or even increase emotional arousal. Integrating this practice flexibly, respecting the individual needs of the caregiver, is key to making it truly beneficial.

Understanding babywearing from this perspective avoids unnecessary idealizations and allows it to be placed where it truly adds value: as a resource that can support adult emotional regulation and reduce burnout, always within a broader framework of care, support, and mental health.

Conclusions: when the context regulates what the will cannot achieve

Infant crying is not only an emotional challenge, but also a biological signal that activates deep systems in the adult brain. Throughout this article, we have seen that the way this signal is processed depends not only on the sound or the caregiver's intention, but also on the bodily, physiological, and relational context in which it occurs. Physical proximity, by reducing sensory ambiguity and stabilizing adult activation, can significantly modify how the amygdala interprets and responds to crying.

Babywearing doesn't transform the caregiver or eliminate the exhaustion inherent in early caregiving. Its effect is more subtle and, therefore, more interesting from a neuroscience perspective: it introduces conditions that facilitate more organized emotional regulation and less reactive interaction. It doesn't act on willpower, but rather on the environment in which that willpower attempts to operate. In this sense, many of the limitations we attribute to patience or self-control could actually be related to an excess of sustained activation.

This perspective invites us to rethink a deeply ingrained idea: that the quality of an adult's response depends almost exclusively on individual emotional strength. If the brain responds differently depending on the bodily and relational context, perhaps the relevant question is not only how we should react to crying, but what conditions we are creating to make that reaction possible.

To what extent are many of our difficulties as caregivers more related to the context in which we provide care than to our personal ability to regulate ourselves?

References

• Anisfeld, E., Casper, V., Nozyce, M., & Cunningham, N. (1990). Does infant carrying promote attachment? An experimental study of the effects of increased physical contact on the development of attachment. Child Development, 61(5), 1617–1627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02888.x

• Feldman, R., Singer, M., & Zagoory-Sharon, O. (2010). Touch attenuates infants’ physiological reactivity to stress. Developmental Science, 13(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00890.x

• Hunziker, U. A., & Barr, R. G. (1986). Increased carrying reduces infant crying: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 77(5), 641–648. PMID: 3517799

• Kim, S., Fonagy, P., Allen, J., & Strathearn, L. (2014). Mothers’ unresolved trauma blunts amygdala response to infant distress. Social Neuroscience, 9(4), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.896287

• Lorberbaum, J. P., Newman, J. D., Dubno, J. R., Horwitz, A. R., Nahas, Z., Teneback, C. C., Bloomer, C. C., Bohning, D. E., Vincent, D., Johnson, M. R., Emmanuel, N., Brawman-Mintzer, O., Book, S. W., Lydiard, R. B., Ballenger, J. C., & George, M. S. (1999). Feasibility of using fMRI to study mothers responding to infant cries. Depression and Anxiety, 10(3), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1999)10:3<99::AID-DA2>3.0.CO;2-#

• Norholt, H., Price, C., Phillips, R., & McNeilly, J. (2022). Babywearing practices and effects on parental, child physical and psychological health. Academic Journal of Pediatrics & Neonatology, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.15406/ajpn.2022.11.00556

• Pisacane, A., Continisio, P., Filosa, C., Tagliamonte, V., & Continisio, G. I. (2012). Use of baby carriers to increase breastfeeding duration among term infants: The effects of an educational intervention in Italy. Acta Paediatrica, 101(10), e434–e438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02758.x

• Riem, M. M. E., Lotz, A. M., Horstman, L. I., Cima, M., Verhees, M. W. F. T., Alyousefi-van Dijk, K., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2021). A soft baby carrier intervention enhances amygdala responses to infant crying in fathers: A randomized controlled trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 132, 105380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105380

• Seifritz, E., Esposito, F., Neuhoff, J. G., Lüthi, A., Mustovic, H., Dammann, G., von Bardeleben, U., Radue, E. W., Cirillo, S., Tedeschi, G., & Di Salle, F. (2003). Differential sex-independent amygdala response to infant crying and laughing in parents versus nonparents. Biological Psychiatry, 54(12), 1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00697-8

• Atzil, S., Hendler, T., & Feldman, R. (2011). Specifying the neurobiological basis of human attachment: Brain, hormones, and behavior in synchronous and intrusive mothers. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(12), 2603–2615. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.172